TRANSIENT SIMULATION AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF NOVEL EVAPORATOR FOR OTEC APPLICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v12.254Keywords:
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion; Evaporator De-sign; Transient CFD Simulation.Abstract
cean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) harnesses the temperature difference between warm surface seawater and cold deep seawater to generate electricity. The evaporator, a key component, facilitates heat absorption and phase change in the working fluid. This study presents a transient simulation and performance analysis of a novel evaporator design for OTEC, aiming to enhance heat transfer efficiency while minimizing pressure drop. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed using ANSYS Fluent, incorporating various mass flow rates and turbulence models. The k-omega SST model proved most effective in capturing phase change dynamics. Results show the proposed design absorbs 2 kW more thermal energy than conventional designs at scale, with an optimal flow rate of 0.01856 kg/s balancing energy absorption and pressure constraints. The maximum pressure drop was 6.19 kPa for R-22, significantly lower than traditional heat exchangers. The design improves heat transfer and reduces energy losses, enhancing OTEC system efficiency. Turbulence-enhancing modifications at the inlet were identified to further accelerate phase change without excessive pressure penalties. These advancements support more efficient Rankine cycle implementations, improving OTEC feasibility and scalability. This study contributes to the development of high-performance heat exchangers, advancing OTEC as a sustainable energy solution.
References
Masutani, S. M., & Takahashi, P. K. (2001). Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC). In J. H. Steele, S. A. Thorpe, & K. K. Turekian (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences (pp. 1993–1999). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1006/rwos.2001.0031
Sanjivy, K., Raybaud, P., Hunt, J., Ferrucci, F., Baucour, P., Marc, O., & Lucas, F. (2026). Harnessing the ocean's depths: SWAC and OTEC for sustainable cooling and power – A review of technologies, applications and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 226(A), 116253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116253
Jing, F., Wang, X., Mei, Y., & Tian, R. (2025). A comprehensive review on ocean thermal energy conversion technology: Thermodynamic optimization, multi-energy integration, and byproduct utilization. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 27, 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101188
Tinakar, A. (2013). Ocean thermal energy conversion. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 2(4), 143. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20130204.11
Wu, Z., Feng, H., Chen, L., Xie, Z., & Cai, C. (2019). Pumping power minimization of an evaporator in ocean thermal energy conversion system based on constructal theory. Energy, 181, 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.216
Musabikha, S., & Utama, I. K. A. P. (2017). Corrosion in the marine renewable energy: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Clean Energy, 7(1). http://isomase.org/IJERCE1.php
Zhang, W., Li, Y., Wu, X., & Guo, S. (2018). Review of the applied mechanical problems in ocean thermal energy conversion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.048
Abidin, M. Z. Z., Rodhi, M. N. M., Hamzah, F., & Ghazali, N. A. (2021). Assessing biofouling in ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) power plant – A review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2053, No. 1, p. 012011). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2053/1/012011
Adie, P. W., et al. (2023). Non-linear assessment of cold-water pipe (CWP) on the ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) installation under bending load. Procedia Structural Integrity, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.07.005
Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhou, P., Zhang, Y., & Yuan, H. (2022). Performance improvement of ocean thermal energy conversion organic Rankine cycle under temperature glide effect. Energy, 246, 123440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123440
Chan, W. L., & Chiong, M. S. (2023). A performance study of R717 and R22 as the working fluid for OTEC plant. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1143, No. 1, p. 012018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1143/1/012018
Patil, P. M., Yadav, A. P., & Patil, P. A. (2015). Comparative study between heat transfer through laminar flow and turbulent flow. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2015.0404076
AIChE. (2018). The essentials of continuous evaporation. https://www.aiche.org/cep
Ma, Q., et al. (2023). Performance improvement of OTEC-ORC and turbine based on binary zeotropic working fluid. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, Article 8892450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8892450
Yasunaga, T., Miyazaki, A., Fontaine, K., & Ikegami, Y. (n.d.). Comprehensive heat exchanger performance evaluation method on ocean thermal energy conversion for maximum net power. Unpublished technical paper
Rao, B. S., Krishna, M. M., Sastry, R. C., Professor, A., & Student, P. (2014). Experimental studies on pressure drop in a sinusoidal plate heat exchanger: Effect of corrugation angle. http://www.iirct.org
Ikegami, Y., Mutair, S., & Kawabata, Y. (2015). Experimental and numerical investigations on plate-type heat exchanger performance. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 5(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2015.51011
Peng, J., Chen, F., Liu, L., Ge, Y., Wu, H., & Liu, W. (2020). Experimental research on plate heat exchanger in OTEC system. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 23(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.202003_23(1).0003
Yoon, J. I., Son, C. H., Baek, S. M., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. S. (2014). Efficiency comparison of subcritical OTEC power cycle using various working fluids. Heat and Mass Transfer, 50(7), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1310-8
Xiao, C., & Gulfam, R. (2023). Opinion on ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC). Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1115695
Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Adam, N. M., Attia, O., Al-Sulttani, A. O., & Mahmood, H. A. (2020). Numerical analysis for solar panel subjected with an external force to overcome adhesive force in desert areas. CFD Letters, 12(9), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.12.9.6075
Rathore, S. S., Mehta, B., Kumar, P., & Asfer, M. (2023, December). Numerical validation of Lee's evaporation model for heat pipe applications [Poster]. Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai; Indian Institute of Technology Mandi; Shaqra University.
Rocheleau, R. E. (2014). Asia Pacific Research Initiative for Sustainable Energy Systems 2011 (APRISES11) OTEC heat exchanger development and testing task 4.1 (Report No. AD1040493). Defense Technical Information Center.
Abu-Khader, M. M. (2012). Plate heat exchangers: Recent advances. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 1883–1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.009
Martins, G., Zanzi, M., Oliveira, J. L. G., & De Paiva, K. V. (2024). Structural analysis and sealing capacity of gasketed plate heat exchangers with HNBR and EPDM rubbers. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 46(10), 602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05183-4
Yasunaga, T., Noguchi, T., Morisaki, T., & Ikegami, Y. (2018). Basic heat exchanger performance evaluation method on OTEC. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 6(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6020032
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Journal of Transpot System Engineering (JTSE) belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the JTSE. Examples of analysis performed within are only examples and they should not be utilized in real-world. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any JTSE entities.
