DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF EXPANDER FOR WASTE HEAT RECOVERY APPLICATION

Authors

  • Tee Jia Zheng Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Chiong Meng Soon UTM LoCARtic, Institute for Sustainable Transport (IST), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mahadhir Mohammad UTM LoCARtic, Institute for Sustainable Transport (IST), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Chun Mein Soon UTM LoCARtic, Institute for Sustainable Transport (IST), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v11.239

Keywords:

Axial Expander; Meanline Approach; Computational Fluid Dynamics ANSYS CFX; Waste Heat Recovery

Abstract

Waste heat recovery (WHR) is one of the solutions for net zero carbon and decarbonization activity. Currently, the Organic Rankine Cycle is widely studied because of its capability to operate at a wide range of temperatures, scalability, lower operating temperature, and high thermal efficiency. Despite advancements, challenges in expander design and performance analysis limit waste heat recovery. Therefore, the objective is to design and analyse a suitable expander for waste heat recovery and achieve a total-to-total efficiency exceeding 70% with a minimum power output of 30kW at a pressure ratio of 1.4. The design and performance analysis for 3D blade geometry and expander using the ANSYS CFX software. An applied meanline modelling was conducted using MATLAB. The results demonstrated the expander's capability to generate 35.857 kW of power, exceeding the design target. Additionally, a total-to-total efficiency of 74.69% was achieved, surpassing the minimum efficiency threshold of 70%, even after accounting for tip leakage losses. The findings contribute valuable insights for optimizing expander designs and advancing waste heat recovery technologies aligning with global efforts to promote sustainable energy systems.

References

Mahmoudi A, Fazli M, Morad MR. A recent review of waste heat recovery by Organic Rankine Cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018; 143: 660–675.

Le VL, Feidt M, Kheiri A, et al. Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids. Energy 2014; 67: 513–526.

Bahrami M, Pourfayaz F, Kasaeian A. Low global warming potential (GWP) working fluids (WFs) for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applications. Energy Reports 2022; 8: 2976–2988.

Zhang Y, Yang K, Li X, et al. The thermodynamic effect of thermal energy storage on compressed air energy storage system. Renew Energy 2013; 50: 227–235.

Chan WL, Chiong MS. A performance study of R717 and R22 as the working fluid for OTEC plant. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Institute of Physics, 2023. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1143/1/012018.

Bao J, Zhao L. A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013; 24: 325–342.

Wang HX, Lei B, Wu YT, et al. Regulation strategies and optimizations of the expander and pump in organic Rankine cycle under off-design conditions. Appl Therm Eng; 259. Epub ahead of print 15 January 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124807.

Gungor U, Hosoz M. Performance comparison of a mobile air conditioning system using an orifice tube as an expansion device for R1234yf and R134a. Sci Technol Built Environ 2024; 30: 588–598.

Fatigati F, Coletta A, Di Bartolomeo M, et al. The dynamic behaviour of ORC-based power units fed by exhaust gases of internal combustion engines in mobile applications. Appl Therm Eng; 240. Epub ahead of print 1 March 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122215.

Alshammari F, Karvountzis-Kontakiotis A, Pesyridis A, et al. Expander technologies for automotive engine organic Rankine cycle applications. Energies; 11. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11071905.

Tocci L, Pal T, Pesmazoglou I, et al. Small scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A techno-economic review. Energies; 10. Epub ahead of print 23 March 2017. DOI: 10.3390/en10040413.

Dumont O, Dickes R, Lemort V. Experimental investigation of four volumetric expanders. In: Energy Procedia. Elsevier Ltd, 2017, pp. 859–866.

Alshammari F, Karvountzis-Kontakiotis A, Pesyridis A, et al. Expander technologies for automotive engine organic Rankine cycle applications. Energies; 11. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.3390/en11071905.

Dixon SL, Hall CA. Axial-Flow Turbines. In: Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery. Elsevier, 2010, pp. 97–141.

Ramchandra Rane S, Bianchi G, Kovačević A, et al. CFD Analysis of an ORC Vane Expander using OpenFOAM Solver, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/icec (2021).

S.L. Dixon, C.A. Hall. Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery. United KIngdom: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-05059-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Jia Zheng, T., Meng Soon, C., Mohammad, M., & Soon, C. M. (2024). DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF EXPANDER FOR WASTE HEAT RECOVERY APPLICATION. Journal of Transport System Engineering, 11(2), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v11.239

Issue

Section

Transport System Engineering

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)