COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS ANALYSIS OF NEW CONCEPT HEAT EXCHANGER FOR OTEC APPLICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v11.238Keywords:
OTEC, Heat exchanger, Evaporation frequency, ANSYS simulation, EffectivenessAbstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a new concept of heat exchanger for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) applications. The study utilizes Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to evaluate the performance of different heat exchanger designs for extracting thermal energy from oceanic sources, specifically using water and R717 liquid. Key performance parameters including cold vapor fraction, temperature difference, and pressure drop are evaluated through a combination of numerical simulations and experimental validations. The analysis of the cold vapor fraction provides insights into evaporation rates and their distribution across multiple prototypes, highlighting the impact of the wetted area on heat transfer effectiveness. The evaluation of temperature differences reveals variations in discharge fluid temperatures, with some prototypes deviating from thermodynamic principles at a default evaporation frequency of 0.1. Various evaporation frequencies are simulated and compared with experimental data to select the optimal frequency for each prototype. The simulations and experiments, conducted under similar conditions, ensure accurate validation despite inconsistencies arising from variations in heat exchanger design and boundary conditions. The performance evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the three prototypes, with Prototype 2 achieving the highest effectiveness up to 59% for OTEC applications. The findings contribute to a better understanding of heat exchanger performance in OTEC and provide valuable insights for design optimization and future application development. This paper emphasizes the significance of efficient heat transfer and highlights the potential of ocean thermal energy as a renewable and sustainable resource.
References
J. L. Holechek, H. M. E. Geli, M. N. Sawalhah, and R. Valdez, “A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 8, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084792.
A. Mostafaeipour, A. Bidokhti, M. B. Fakhrzad, A. Sadegheih, and Y. Zare Mehrjerdi, “A new model for the use of renewable electricity to reduce carbon dioxide emissions,” Energy, vol. 238, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121602.
S. M. Masutani and P. K. Takahashi, “Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (otec),” Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, pp. 1993–1999, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1006/RWOS.2001.0031.
L. Aresti, P. Christodoulides, C. Michailides, and T. Onoufriou, “Reviewing the energy, environment, and economy prospects of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) systems,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 60, p. 103459, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.SETA.2023.103459.
K. Fontaine, T. Yasunaga, and Y. Ikegami, “OTEC maximum net power output using carnot cycle and application to simplify heat exchanger selection,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 12, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3390/e21121143.
R. K. Shah and D. P. Sekulic, “FUNDAMENTALS OF HEAT EXCHANGER DESIGN,” 2003.
A. Kasaeian, A. Shamaeizadeh, and B. Jamjoo, “Combinations of Rankine with ejector refrigeration cycles: Recent progresses and outlook,” Appl Therm Eng, vol. 211, p. 118382, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2022.118382.
T. T N et al., “Leveraging artificial neural networks approach for thermal conductivity evaluation in porous rectangular wetted fins filled with ternary hybrid nanofluid,” J Radiat Res Appl Sci, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 101125, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JRRAS.2024.101125.
N. Samsuri, N. Sazali, A. S. Jamaludin, and M. N. M. Razali, “Performance of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Closed Rankine Cycle Using Different Working Fluids,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing Ltd, Feb. 2021. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1062/1/012040.
A. Katz and V. Sankaran, “Mesh quality effects on the accuracy of CFD solutions on unstructured meshes,” J Comput Phys, vol. 230, no. 20, pp. 7670–7686, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.JCP.2011.06.023.
S. Alfarawi, A. El-Sawi, and H. Omar, “Exploring Discontinuous Meshing for CFD Modelling of Counter Flow Heat Exchanger,” Journal of Advanced Research in Numerical Heat Transfer, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122881534&partnerID=40&md5=01fd121405f819333f2c3f50ce24560c
Z. Tan, Z. Cao, W. Chu, and Q. Wang, “Prediction accuracy improvement on evaporation-condensation process via a temperature deviation based dynamic correction model,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4415020
J. Castaing-Lasvignottes, A. Dijoux, F. Sinama, B. Clauzade, O. Marc Marc, and O. Marc, “A presentation of the ocean thermal energy conversion prototype in La Reunion,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-02999786v1
T. Yasunaga, T. Noguchi, T. Morisaki, and Y. Ikegami, “Basic heat exchanger performance evaluation method on OTEC,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 6, no. 2, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.3390/jmse6020032.
T. Yasunaga, K. Fontaine, T. Morisaki, and Y. Ikegami, “Performance Evaluation of Heat Exchangers for Application to Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion System,” 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Journal of Transpot System Engineering (JTSE) belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the JTSE. Examples of analysis performed within are only examples and they should not be utilized in real-world. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any JTSE entities.
