The Analysis of Lateral Stability of Tailless Camar-3 With Winglets

Authors

  • Koo Hwai Yeng School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • Mohd Nazri Mohd Nasir School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • Shuhaimi Mansor School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor

Keywords:

Tailless UAV, dynamic wind tunnel test, aerodynamic stability derivatives, lateral stability, winglets

Abstract

This paper analyses the lateral stability of tailless CAMAR-3 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) when its tail fin (i.e. V-tail) is reconfigured to the wingtips. A tailless UAV may have longer endurance time, compared to the present configuration of V-tail. Nevertheless, a tailless UAV may experience reduction in lateral stability due to loss of yaw control surfaces. In the preliminary design of tailless-winglets UAV, semi-empirical method is applied to estimate the aerodynamic lateral stability derivatives, in order to investigate the stability of both configurations of UAV. A dynamic test rig based on pure yawing motion is built, to measure the lateral stability derivatives of  and  The time response data of pure yawing oscillation give the natural frequency and damping ratio that describe the aerodynamic derivatives as a result from wind-on and wind-off tunnel tests. The result indicates that UAV with either configurations are laterally stable. However, the tailless-winglets CAMAR has a 13.86% reduction in aerodynamic yawing-moment-due-to-sideslip derivative , compared to  CAMAR-3 with V-tail, whereas the aerodynamic yawing-moment-due-to-yaw-rate derivative  of tailless-winglets CAMAR is 5.55% lesser thanthat of the CAMAR-3 with V-tail. The lateral stability degrades, as expected, caused by tail stabilizer removal. In conclusion, the idea of tail removal and using winglets as the directional controllers is feasible.

References

S. Hayat, E. Yanmaz, and R. Muzaffar, "Survey on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks for Civil Applications: A Communications Viewpoint," IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2624-2661, 2016.

H. Karakas, E. Koyuncu, and G. Inalhan, "ITU Tailless UAV Design," Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 69, no. 1-4, pp. 131-146, 2013.

J. Weierman and J. Jacob, "Winglet Design and Optimization for UAVs," in 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2010, p. 4224.

D. Ciliberti, P. Della Vecchia, F. Nicolosi, and A. De Marco, "Aircraft Directional Stability and Vertical Tail Design: A Review of Semi-Empirical Methods," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 95, pp. 140-172, 2017.

S. Mansor and M. A. Passmore, "Estimation of Bluff Body Transient Aerodynamics Using an Oscillating Model Rig," Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 96, no. 6-7, pp. 1218-1231, 2008.

J. Roskam, Airplane Design DARcorporation, 1985.

R. C. Nelson, Flight Stability and Automatic Control. WCB/McGraw Hill New York, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-29

How to Cite

Hwai Yeng, K., Mohd Nasir, M. N., & Mansor, S. (2019). The Analysis of Lateral Stability of Tailless Camar-3 With Winglets. Journal of Transport System Engineering, 6(1). Retrieved from https://jtse.utm.my/index.php/jtse/article/view/126

Issue

Section

Transport System Engineering

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.