INVESTIGATION OF WIND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS USING PASSIVE DEVICES IN BOUNDARY LAYER WIND TUNNEL

Authors

  • Miko Hadi Wijaya Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Ahmad Faiz Mohammad Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Nurizzatul Atikha Rahmat Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nor’azizi Othman Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v11.230

Keywords:

wind tunnel; boundary layer; surface roughness

Abstract

Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) flow can be generated in an open-loop boundary layer wind tunnel (BLWT) to simulate a realistic rough-wall condition imposed on the natural wind. An open-loop BLWT experiment is performed in this work using a wall barrier and roughness elements as passive devices to create a rough-wall condition and reproduce a realistic neutral ABL flow. The roughness elements used are homogeneous cubic blocks with a side length of 25 mm arranged in a staggered layout at 12.5% packing density. Wind velocity data is measured in the upstream test section of the BLWT using a hot-wire anemometer (HWA) to obtain the wind velocity profiles, i.e., mean wind velocity, standard deviation, and skewness. The height z was measured from z = 7 mm from the test section floor to z = 800 mm. The mean vertical velocity profile of the rough wall indicates a significant decrease within the height interval of z/zref < 1.0 due to the surface roughness. Additionally, the normalized mean wind velocity is approaching unity at z/zref = 1 with the rough wall, whereas the smooth wall (no roughness elements) is observed at z/zref = 0.1. Moreover, the standard deviation profile of the rough wall shows higher values in the near-wall region (z/zref ≤ 0.4), suggesting a higher level of turbulence in the wind flow due to surface roughness. Finally, the rough wall skewness profile is left-skewed, suggesting a non-Gaussian feature. The study found that roughness parameters affect vertical velocity profiles and create realistic atmospheric boundary layer flows.

References

P. E. Hancock and P. Hayden. ‘Wind-Tunnel Simulation of Weakly and Moderately Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layers’, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 168, 29-57, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0337-7

V. Vikneshvaran, S. A. Zaki, N. A. Rahmat, M. S. M. Ali, F. Yakub. ‘Evaluation of Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Open-Loop Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Experiment’, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 72, 2, 79-92, 2020.

S. Kuznetsov, M. Ribičić, S. Pospíšil, M. Plut, A. Trush, and H. Kozmar, “Flow and turbulence control in a boundary layer wind tunnel using passive hardware devices,” Exp. Tech., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 643–661, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0196-z

N. J. Cook, “Wind-tunnel simulation of the adiabatic atmospheric boundary layer by roughness, barrier and mixing-device methods,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 3, no. 2–3, pp. 157–176, 1978, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(78)90007-7

Y. M. H’ng, N. Ikegaya, S. A. Zaki, A. Hagishima, A. F. Mohammad. ‘Wind-Tunnel Estimation of Mean and Turbulent Wind Speeds within Canopy Layer for Urban Campus’, Urban Climate, 41, 2022, 101064, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101064

N. A. Rahmat, A. Hagishima, and N. Ikegaya. ‘Experimental Study on Effect of Spires on the Lateral Nonuniformity of Mean Flow in a Wind Tunnel’, 1-15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5109/1929670

Z. Mo and C.-H. Liu. ‘A Wind Tunnel Study of Ventilation Mechanism over Hypothetical Urban Roughness: The Role of Intermittent Motion Scales’, Building and Environment, 135, 94-103, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.031

Z. Liu, C. Zheng, Y. Wu, R. G. J. Flay, and K. Zhang. ‘Wind Tunnel Simulation of Wind Flows with the Characteristics of Thousand-Meter High ABL’, Building and Environment, 152, 74-86, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.012

Z. Mo, C.-H. Liu, and Y.-K. Ho. ‘Roughness Sublayer Flows over Real Urban Morphology: A Wind Tunnel Study’, Building and Environment, 188, 2021, 107463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107463

Scharnowski, S., Bross, M. & Kähler, C.J. Accurate turbulence level estimations using PIV/PTV. Exp Fluids 60, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2646-5

G. Fang, L. Zhao, S. Cao, Y. Ge and K. Li, ‘Gust Characteristics of Near-Ground Typhoon Winds’, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 188, 323-337, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.008

Zhang, J., Li, G., Shi, L., Huang, N., and Shao, Y.: Impact of turbulence on aeolian particle entrainment: results from wind-tunnel experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9525–9535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9525-2022, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Wijaya , M. H., Zaki , S. A., Mohammad , A. F., Rahmat , N. A., & Othman, N. (2024). INVESTIGATION OF WIND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS USING PASSIVE DEVICES IN BOUNDARY LAYER WIND TUNNEL . Journal of Transport System Engineering, 11(1), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v11.230

Issue

Section

Transport System Engineering

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)