FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SURROGATE MODEL FOR THE APPLICATION OF VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v8.170Abstract
High-fidelity (HF) model always provides better performance in assessing vehicle suspension system design compared to low-fidelity (LF) model. However, HF model is computationally expensive. On the contrary, LF model, which depends on a few parameters allow the simulation of ’what-if’ problem run faster and the results potentially comparable with HF model. This research attempts to conduct feasibility study on LF model using the surrogate model for the application of vehicle suspension study. The surrogate models are classified into three types which are Response-Based (RB) model, Variable-Based (VB) model, and Parameter-Based (PB) model. Through three statistical metrics and graphical interpretation, the results show that VB model gave the most superior performance compared to RB model and PB model.
References
Papalambros, P.Y., and Wilde, W.J., 2017. Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation, 3rd. Edition. Cambridge University Press.
Kiencke, U. and Nielsen, L., 2000. Automotive Control Systems: For Engine, Driveline, and Vehicle. Germany, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L., 2013. In Koziel, S., and Leifsson, L. (Eds). Surrogate-Based Modeling and Optimization: Applications in Engineering. Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Blundell, M. and Harty, D., 2015. The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics. 2nd. Edition. United Kingdom. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Sharp, R.S., 1991. Computer Codes for Road Vehicle Dynamic Models. Institution of Mechanical Engineers Paper 427/16/064, Autotech ’91, Birmingham.
Uys, P.E., Els, P.S., and Thoresson, M.J., 2006. Criteria for Handling Measurement. Journal of Terramechanics 43. 43-67.
Gobbi, M., Haque, I., Papalambros P.P.Y., and Mastinu, G., 2006. A Critical Review of Optimization Methods for Road Vehicles Design, 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multi-Disciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. 6 - 8 September 2006. Portsmouth, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
Berci, M., Toropov, V.V., Hewson, R.W., and Gaskell, P.H., 2009. Metamodeling Based on High and Low Fidelity Models Interaction for UAV Gust Performance Optimization. 50th AAIA/ASME/ASCE.AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials conference. 4-7 May. California, Palm Springs, 1-40.
Bhosekar, A. and Ierapetritou, M., 2018. Advances in Surrogate-based Modeling, Feasibility Analysis, and Optimization: A Review. Computers & Chemical Engineering. An International Journal of Computer Applications in Chemical Engineering. Volume 108. pp 250-256.
Storey, I., Bourmistrova, A., and Subic, A. (2008). Performance Measures of Comfort and Rattlespace Usage for Limited-Stroke Vehicle Suspension Systems. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibrations. Vol. 13(2), pp. 1-9.
Dukkipati, R., Pang, J., Qatu, M.S., Sheng, G., and Shuguang, Z., 2008. Road Vehicle Dynamics. Warrendale PA: SAE International.
Olley, M., 1946. Road Manners of the Modern Car. Proceedings of the Institution of Automobile Engineers. September, Vol. 41, 523-551.
Jazar, R.N., 2017. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. Third Edition. Springer International Publishing.
Sun, T., Zhang, Y., and Barak, P., 2002. 4-DOF Vehicle Ride Model, SAE Technical Series. 2002-01-1580.
Kim, C., and Ro, P.I., 2002. An Accurate Full Car Ride Model Using Model Reducing Techniques. Journal of Mechanical Design. Transactions of the ASME. Vol. 124, pp. 697 – 705.
Firth, G.R., 1991. The Performance of Vehicle Suspensions Fitted With Controllable Dampers. PhD Thesis, The University of Leeds, Leeds.
Hyvarinen, J.K., 2004. The Improvement of Full Vehicle Semi-Active Suspension Through Kinematical Model. PhD Thesis. University of Oulu.
Ghike, C., and Shim, T., 2006. 14 Degree-of-Freedom Vehicle Model for Roll Dynamics Study. SAE Technical Paper Series. 2006-01-1277.
Samin, P.M., 2010. Hybrid Stability Augmentation System-Force Control of Semi-Active Suspension with Magnetorheological Damper. PhD Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.
Chapra, S., 2018. Applied Numerical Methods with MATLAB for Engineers and Scientists. Fourth Edition. NewYork: McGraw-Hill Education.
Gilat, A. and Subramaniam, V., 2013. Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. Third Edition. Wiley Global Education.
Toropov, V.V., Van Keulen, F., Markine, V.L., Alvarez, L.F., 1999. Multipoint Approximations Based on Response Surface Fitting: A Summary of Recent Developments. Proceedings of the 1st ASMO UK/ISSMO Conference, Ilkley, pp. 371–380. Bradford: MCB University Press.
Toropov, V.V., 2001. Modeling and Approximation Strategies in Optimization: Global and Mid-Range Approximation, Response Surface Methods, Genetic Programming, Low / High Fidelity Models. In Balchut, J. and Eschenauer, H.A. (Eds). Emerging Methods for Multidisciplinary Optimization, 205-256. Italy: Springer-Verlag Wien New York.
Messac, A. (2015). Optimization in Practice with MATLAB for Engineering Students and Professionals. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Forrester, A.I.J., Sobester, A., and Keane, A.J., 2008. Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide. UK: John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.
Crolla, D.A., 1995. Vehicle Dynamics - Theory into Practice. Automobile Division Chairman’s Address, Institution of Mechanical Engineers.
Gilliespie, T. D., 1992. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. USA: SAE Publications.
Barak, P., 1991. Magic Numbers in Design of Suspension for Passenger Car. SAE Technical Paper Series. 911921, pp. 53-88.
Nunney, M.J., 2007. Light and Heavy Vehicle Technology. 4th Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Popp, K., and Schiehlen, W., 2010. Ground Vehicle Dynamics. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Chapra, S.C. and Canale, R.P., 2020. Numerical Methods for Engineers. 8th Edition. New York. Mc Graw Hill.
Wang, G.G., and Shan, S., 2006. Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization. ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 1: 32nd Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B.
Jiang, R., Jin, Z., Liu, D., and Wang, D., 2021. Multi-Objective Lightweight Optimization of Parameterized Suspension Components Based on NSGA-II Algorithm Coupling with Surrogate Model. Machines 2021, 9, 107.
Fouladinejad, N., Fouladinejad, Jalil, M.K.A, and Taib, J.M., 2017. Decomposition-Assisted Computational Technique Based on Surrogate Modeling for Real-Time Simulations. Complexity. Vol. 2017. Article ID 1686230.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Journal of Transpot System Engineering (JTSE) belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the JTSE. Examples of analysis performed within are only examples and they should not be utilized in real-world. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any JTSE entities.
